本/雑誌
TERRITORIAL ISSUE BETWEEN JAPAN AND KOREA CASE OF TAKESHIMA/DOKTO A Critique of the"10 Issues of Takeshima"Published by the MOFA
Seichu Naito/〔著〕 Sinkansya Editorial Room/〔訳〕
1100円
| ポイント | 1% (11p) |
|---|---|
| 発売日 | 2009/01/28 発売 |
| 出荷目安 | メーカー在庫見込あり:1-3週間
※出荷目安について |
著者・出版社・関連アーティスト
関連記事
収録内容
| 1 | 1 Japan has long recognized the existence of Takeshima.→Is it true? |
| 2 | 2 There is no evidence that the Republic of Korea(ROK)has long recognized the existence of Takeshima.→What is the truth? |
| 3 | 3 Japan used Takeshima as a stopover port en route to Utsuryo(Ulleung‐do)Island and as fishing ground.It thus established its sovereignty over Takeshima by the mid 17th century at the very latest.→What are the grounds for this argument? |
| 4 | 4 At the end of the 17th century Japan prohibited passage of ships to Utsuryo Island,but not to Takeshima.→What are the historic facts? |
| 5 | 5 The deposition by Ahn Yong‐bok,on which the ROK side bases its claim,contains many points that conflict with factual evidence.→What is the important fact? |
| 6 | 6 Japan reaffirmed its intention to claim sovereignty over Takeshima by incorporating Takeshima into Shimane Prefecture in 1905.→What does "reaffirmed its intention" mean? |
| 8 | 8 In 1952,Takeshima was designated as a bombing range for the U.S.Forces stationed in Japan,which shows that Takeshima was treated as part of the territory of Japan.→What was the background of this U.S.action? |
| 9 | 9 The ROK is illegally occupying Takeshima,against which Japan has been consistently making strong protests.→What are Japan's protests about? |
| 10 | 10 Although Japan proposed to the ROK that the dispute over Takeshima be referred to the International Court of Justice,the ROK rejected this proposal.→What are the untold stories? |
